Friday Links

War Crimes:

WASHINGTON — Red Cross investigators concluded last year in a secret report that the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogation methods for high-level Qaeda prisoners constituted torture and could make the Bush administration officials who approved them guilty of war crimes, according to a new book [The Dark Side] on counterterrorism efforts since 2001.

The book says that the International Committee of the Red Cross declared in the report, given to the C.I.A. last year, that the methods used on Abu Zubaydah, the first major Qaeda figure the United States captured, were “categorically” torture, which is illegal under both American and international law.

Saturday Morning War Crimes Update:

Greenwald writes a good one, and . . .




4th Amendment:

Feingold: "I sit on the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, and I am one of the few members of this body who has been fully briefed on the warrantless wiretapping program. And, based on what I know, I can promise that if more information is declassified about the program in the future, as is likely to happen either due to the Inspector General report, the election of a new President, or simply the passage of time, members of this body will regret that we passed this legislation. I am also familiar with the collection activities that have been conducted under the Protect America Act and will continue under this bill. I invite any of my colleagues who wish to know more about those activities to come speak to me in a classified setting. Publicly, all I can say is that I have serious concerns about how those activities may have impacted the civil liberties of Americans. If we grant these new powers to the government and the effects become known to the American people, we will realize what a mistake it was, of that I am sure."

When the day comes that the mistake is painfully obvious to everyone, we will get a replay of the "no one said we shouldn't go into Iraq" game. There was significant public opposition to invading Iraq, but it was kept out of the press. Now the primary voices on TV are those that were wrong in the first place, and they say we shouldn't talk about the past. They say "if only they had prosecuted the war" the way I thought they should have, everything would be great. Bill-friggin-Kristol has been hired at the NYT. Dems that voted for the AUMF said they were duped, yet it was clear the claims were bogus then. Expect the same with this FISA law.


Anthrax: Incredible exchange here.

Leahy: "We're paying Hatfill millions of dollars, the indication being the guy who committed the crime went free."

Don't forget: the anthrax was linked, via ABC's dishonest anonymous source, to Iraq. Powell had a vial of it at the U.N.. It was a central part of the WMD propoganda, right up there with the bogus yellow cake.


Non-Internet Media:

This is the week that should have effectively ended John McCain's efforts to become the next president of the United States. But you wouldn't know it if you watched any of the mainstream media outlets or followed political reporting in the major newspapers.

During this past week: McCain called the most important entitlement program in the U.S. a disgrace, his top economic adviser called the American people whiners, McCain released an economic plan that no one thought was serious, he flip flopped on Iraq, joked about the deaths of Iranian citizens, and denied making comments that he clearly made -- TWICE. All this and it is not even Friday! Yet watching and reading the mainstream press you would think McCain was having a pretty decent political week, I mean at least Jesse Jackson didn't say anything about him.